INFOWARS| Update: Despite media claims to the contrary, our congressional sources confirmed that the below memo documenting NSA spying on US citizens serves as a primary source of information for the Nunes summary memo:
William Binney, former tech head of the NSA contacted us this morning to send us the link to the reportedly classified memo that lawmakers said was a blueprint of how the Obama administration and the Deep State spied on President Trump.
This memo, hiding in plain site, serves as the basis for the four-page memo of Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) which reveals perjury by the Obama administration when connected to other research.
This is the basic compendium of the NSA abuses spotlighted by Nunes:
In the above memo, the NSA admits that US citizens were targeted by its analysts through Section 702 ‘upstream’ collection and vowed to make changes to its surveillance methods. This indicates the NSA and other intelligence agencies were pressured by the Trump administration to scrap its Obama-era policies that “allowed” illegal spying on US citizens.
“Section 702 has come under fire in recent months due to the alleged ‘unmasking’ and leaking of information about Americans — namely associates of President Donald Trump — that was collected in the surveillance of foreign targets,” reported FCW. “Some members of Congress threatened in March that they would have a hard time renewing 702 before it expires at the end of 2017 unless the administration prosecutes those responsible for the leaks.”
Here’s some interesting excerpts from the above memo:
Page 15 – “…NSA analysts had used US-person identifiers to query the results on Internet ‘upstream’ collection, even though NSA’s Section 702 minimization procedures prohibited such queries.”
Page 19 – “Since 2011, NSA’s minimization procedures have prohibited use of US-person identifiers to query the results of upstream Internet collection under Section 702. The Oct. 26, 2016 Notice informed the Court that NSA analysts had been conducting such queries in violation of that prohibition, with much greater frequency than had previously been disclosed to the Court.”
Page 21 – “The government still had not ascertained the full range of systems that might have been used to conduct improper US-person queries.”
Page 29 – “The elimination of ‘abouts’ collection and, consequently, the more problematic forms of MCTs, focuses Section 702 aqcquisitions more sharply on communications to or from Section 702 targets, who are reasonably believed to be non-US persons outside the United States and expected to receive or communicate foreign intelligence information. That sharper focus should have the effect that US person information acquired under Section 702 will come more predominantly from non-domestic communications that are relevant to the foreign intelligence needs on which the pertinent targeting decisions were based.”
Page 33 – “…Information acquired by FISA electronic surveillance and physical search, which often involve target who are United States persons and typically are directed at persons in the United States.”
SEE BELOW – Binney breaks down what this memo means on Infowars:
HERE IS ELDER PATRIOT’S TAKE AFTER READING THE ENTIRE 99 PAGE DOCUMENT:
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Release Was a Trap – Nothing Earth Breaking – Confirms Obama Appointees’ Violated Targeting Rules
Elder Patriot – Those expecting that the 99-page memo released to Alex Jones shortly after noon today would rock the earth will be sorely disappointed.
FISC Judge Rosemary Collyer did confirm FISA rule violations but the revelations have been widely circulated for many months.
This smacks of the Clintons’ long held practice of slowly leaking incriminating information until the public becomes immune to each successively more damning revelation.
The release did contain a good first step in proving that President Trump had been targeted by Obama’s intelligence community but this was not the explosive memo the House Intel Committee is sitting on that accuses Obama’s minions of knowingly defrauding the FISC by submitting a phony dossier as proof that a warrant was justified.
The FISC did find that Obama appointees at the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, and the National Counterterrorism Center had committed multiple violations of targeting rules:
Further the court found:
The court also held that:
The conclusion is that FISC Judge Rosemary Collyer, who wasn’t looking for proof of wrongdoing but only a reason to grant a warrant, nevertheless found significant violations of FISA regulations.
However, because of the serious nature of the charges Collyer found the violations insufficient to block further surveillance.
What will Collyer rule if the House releases proof that the phony dossier – that was not vetted by the FBI – was the proximate reason for her looking the other way? What if evidence of a Secret Society at the highest levels of the Intel community is found to be committed to bringing down President Trump?
This was not the explosive revelation we’ve been waiting for but it is an important pillar of the entire case against the Deep Sate operatives aligned against Trump.